| |
|
It's always a pleasant surprise when a major news organization steps back from its primary focus, if only for a moment, to examine a new subjector to give us a fresh look at a familiar one. The New York Times has long mastered the art of "special" coverage, and we were reminded of this a few Sundays ago when the Times Magazine devoted an issue to the current state of photography. The Magazine commissioned 18 photographers, including some of its own staff, to examine Times Square through their widely divergent lenses. The results were published as "Assignment: Times Square," and are now available, mostly intact, on the Web.
This is a good collection, though not as deep as the one the Magazine originally published. The photographers included now number 14, and some of these are represented by just one picture. However, the cumulative impact of these photographs is still considerable, and Michael Kimmelmanthe chief art critic of the Timesprovides a thoughtful background essay on the photographers' assignment. The Web exhibit will be updated every six weeks, which should help offset its relative lack of depth vis-a-vis other art and photography sites.
The subject matter helps, too. As Kimmelman notes, Times Square and its denizens have fascinated photographers and the public at large seemingly forever. The district's aesthetic appeal operates on several levels: it is a universal symbol of anonymous urban bustle ("Crossroads of the World"), it represents Theater (at least in this country), and it is a very real locus of gritty street scenes and sordid night life (though this is beginning to change somewhat, now that Disney and other commercial forces have begun a massive cleanup effort). All of this is on display in the Times collection, of course, and it remains very much worth seeing, particularly in light of the substantial changes underway.
(Reviewed June 1, 1997) |
|